TALKIN’ THE "TALK"
It’s a scandal!
Today’s believers no longer speak today’s
language! The Lord of History is doing a "new thing,"1
yet our linguistic journeymen have missed the journey. And, as a
result, God’s "representatives" seldom represent God.
They may "walk the walk," but they can’t "talk
Lost in the past, some know the language of the
seminary, but almost none know the language of the sidewalk. Looking
into rearview mirrors, many understand scientific reality, but few
understand virtual reality. And, learning from soured skeptics, the
majority speak knowingly of grim realities, but few speak
convincingly of glorious visions.
The Christian "elite" walk confidently in the
grammatical, but not in the mystical. They work tirelessly at the
political, but not the poetical. And, they are experts in the
literal, but not the metaphorical.
In short, they’re great at "God talk," but they
don’t know "God’s talk." They embolden their "modern world," yet
they don’t realize their world is no longer modern.
Meanwhile, history moves on:
Language stretches beyond the boundaries of
language itself. It demands new ways of meaning what we mean. It
insists on sayings we’ve never said. And, it requires new—even
simultaneous—definitions of both meaning and reality.
Why must church leaders leave us leaderless? Why
must seminaries refuse teaching the only subject that promises their
survival? And why must we bump into a "New Heaven and New Earth"2
only by accident?
In this "outer space" world, believers shouldn’t
ask, "Is anyone out there?" Ask, instead, "Is anyone here speaking
the language of this world?"
An Ancient/Future Language
Yet, how do we hear this language? And how do we
speak it? How does the church "talk" with the Lord of History and
about the Lord of History when the Lord of History has already moved
beyond our history?
Amazingly, ancient wisdom answers our questions.
The distant past solves our future. Hosea, for example, explains
that the Lord of History speaks to us—and then we share this
inspiration with others—through damah,3 or prophetic
(I’m not hiding behind Scripture simply to
provide a quick and easy answer to a difficult question. Hosea’s
revelation—as we will see—miraculously confirms its own evidence.)
To begin, biblical prophets were masters of
metaphor. They were creators of comparison and contrast—artists of
analogy and affinity—virtuosos of similarity and similitude. And
they worked these spirit-born visions into endless levels of
Yet—astonishingly—we totally miss the
implications. We tragically ignore the connections between then and
now. Why? Because their metaphor was a different metaphor.
Prophetic metaphors, for example, are not part of
our literal world. They have nothing to do with modern language.
They are neither logical ideas, objective truths, nor absolute
knowledge. Nor do they reduce to mere figures of speech, decorative
images, or colorful language.
In fact, the truth in a prophetic metaphor is not
found in the metaphor itself—the message, in other words, is not the
metaphor. Further, these metaphors do not submit totally to our
control—they are neither of us nor by us.
Of course, every metaphor—whether ancient or
modern—puts things side by side that don’t go together, and the
tension or "interplay" between these differences defines the
But prophetic metaphor—in postmodern times—marks
a shift from logic to revelation, from mind to spirit, from
proposition to intuition, and from the literate to the prophetic. As
a result, permissible knowledge and forbidden knowledge are joining
in an unknown intimacy.
And, in this intimacy, metaphor follows few
preset rules. It occurs anytime, anywhere, in any form, and on
several levels at once. And not having answers—within the metaphor
itself—is more essential than having answers.
This ancient/future language flows in a
never-ending cycle—initiated by God and completed by God, with us in
But there’s more—much more. . . .
Few realize Hebrew prophets were also artists.
These prophets, for example, created poetically charged worlds
beyond the world taken for granted. And, through the force of that
inspired artistry, they made "God present and that presence urgent."4
For example, the great narratives of Israel and
the prophetic books in our Bible were lyric oracles or poetic songs.
We know, of course, the Psalms were originally sung. And when David
appointed prophets, he demanded musicians (288 of them!).5
Indeed, prophets and performing artists were so closely connected
Ezekiel complained when people thought of him as "just another
In fact, all the arts—music, poetry, dance,
drama, and visual art—were prophetic. Drama, for example, was "acted
out by prophets."7 Remember that Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and
Hosea all resorted to early versions of drama.8 But,
whatever the art form, prophets spoke dangerously about dangerous
things, and their fictions proved more powerful than facts.
This marriage of prophecy and art makes sense,
for metaphor is the seed—the underlying language—of all the arts.
And prophetic metaphor is the seed of the most profound arts.
So how else will we speak prophetically without
also speaking artistically?
All prophets are necessarily artistic.
What a prophet has to say can never be said in (ordinary)
What It’s Not
Yet, prophetic art is not what we think. So our
story of a new language in a new world remains incomplete.
Prophetic art has nothing to do with "high"
culture, the "fine arts," or what happens Tuesday night at the
museum or concert hall. In other words, it does not pick a time and
place to celebrate how great we are. Neither does it bow before art
itself, mere "ideas" of beauty, nor the rules of art critics. And,
it refuses to extol the glamor of show business personalities or the
"pecking order" of culture-climbers.
Further, prophetic art feels no allegiance to the
strict borders among music, poetry, dance, drama, and visual art. At
the deepest levels, these "categories" are contrived, artificial,
and unnecessary. For "felt meaning" is never sensory specific—as in
"music is only for the ear," or "visual art is only for the eye."
Neither does prophetic art submit to the shallow
decor of a spiritually bankrupt culture—simply filling in the empty
spaces like wall-to-wall carpet. It was never intended, for example,
to seduce the flesh or set a mood.
Finally, prophetic art doesn’t even have to be
"religious." If truly inspired, it needs no doctrine to justify
itself. If it comes from God, it needs no "added glory." If it is
indeed prophetic, it needs no hidden evangelism.
So we must first see what this art is not. Then,
perhaps, we can see what it is.
To see what art is, though, we must also see what
metaphor is: And—simply stated—metaphor is the tension between the
"known" and the "unknown." Here’s more:
The "known" is our accepted reality—anything
credible, literal, "obvious"—anything common, ordinary,
normal—anything familiar or friendly that says who we are.
By contrast, the "unknown" conflicts with the
"known"—it differs, deviates, or dissociates from the "known." It
catches us off-guard—messes with our expectations—pushes our
envelopes. Often, it is a carnival-like violation of the ordinary.
When Isaiah, for example, compares the color of
scarlet and the whiteness of snow with the profound realities of sin
and grace,10 nothing makes sense! Yet, the tension
between the "known" and the "unknown" turns Isaiah’s metaphor into a
powerful mediator of Truth.
We find the same tensions in music: In melody,
harmony, and rhythm, the "known" and the "unknown" play not only
between each of these elements, but within each element as well.
When melody goes against its own direction—when harmony goes against
its own tonality—when offbeat rhythms go against on-the-beat rhythms
. . . mere sound turns into metaphor.
Yet, something startlingly different is happening
in the arts today:
Metaphor is breaking the boundaries of all the
old stereotypes. Strange new metaphoric tensions, for example, are
taking place between things outside of art. Indeed, what we once
called "art" is showing up incognito in life itself. And these new
tensions may prove the most profound metaphor—or art!—of all time.
Here are a few of these phenomena:
Tensions between old and new, local and global,
here and there—between fact and fiction, technology and art, reality
and virtual reality—between the essential and the trivial, the
sacred and the secular, the risk of everything and the risk of
nothing. . . . Comparisons like these seem, at first, unfamiliar,
exotic, even alien. Yet, they are pervasive, and they are ushering
in the world in which we will live.
Ice and Fire
How do we learn to speak this new language? How
do we move responsibly among these new metaphors? How do we survive
this epic metamorphosis?
We begin by realizing we are already "swimming"
in metaphor. Contrary to the cold logic of our great schools, "most
human thought is metaphorical."11 Even "stable scientific
knowledge" is metaphorical.12 In fact, "Without metaphor,
abstract thought is virtually impossible."13
So nothing is trivial. Nothing is insignificant.
Everything "points." Everything "speaks." And, since everything we
do is metaphorical—to those who watch and hear us—we may as well do
it intentionally. We may as well knowingly become a walking parable,
a transforming presence, a vital virtual reality—extracting the
precious from the worthless—making all things sacred.
And, yes, there are risks in these roles. Like
the Wright brothers, we become "conservative daredevils, cautious
prophets."14 And, like those with a foot in both worlds,
we speak with the intellectual ice of Episcopalians, yet the
emotional fire of Pentecostals.
An Inspired Dialogue
Of course, anything prophetic requires
inspiration. So we also harbor an alert expectancy that allows
otherness and newness in any and every moment. And—true
enough!—otherness and newness are always nearby. Inspired metaphor,
in other words, is already there. It hides in the volition of our
imagination, in the poetics of our will, in the empowerment of our
The metaphor in our desire is already in our
Then, in that moment, there comes a quickening—an
intuitive sensitivity, a breath of insight—and we get "carried
along" as in a great river. Such inspiration is the raw reality of
all creativity, all spontaneity.
True originality, of course, "is the prerogative
of God alone."15 Still, prophetic metaphor requires a
dialogue. It is bidirectional. It is an inspired collaboration. It
is a give and take, to-and-fro movement between one place and
Again, we find our model in the distant past:
Hebrew "meditation" was a whirling, revolving reflection with
multilayered metaphor and meaning. In ever deepening circles, the
Hebrew faithful contemplated things of the spirit and expressed the
resulting visions in a dialogue with God.
This example is far more than poetry. It is
frighteningly important: As computer intelligence increases, the
leading of the Holy Spirit will be the only advantage we will have!
...not written with (digital code) but
with the Spirit of the living God . . . on tablets of human
"Utter a Parable"
So we meditate the mystery, but—finally—we shape
the mystery. We stand awed by its depth, but—sooner or later—we
reveal its depth. In other words, we "do" something. We give form to
the "substance," "evidence," and "proof" of things we do not see.17
Like Michelangelo freeing his statues from stone,
we disclose what is already there.
Whether in stories, words, movements, sounds, or
images, we call forth new meanings beyond the boundaries of
language—we proclaim universal truths through vital yet virtual
realities—we "call those things that be not as though they were."18
Or, like a quarterback in football, we throw the
ball where the receiver is not.19
Usually intuitive, we make off-the-wall
comparisons. We put side by side things that don’t go together. We
juxtapose ideas having no desire to coexist. We forcibly interface
the unalike with absurd similarities.
The more sensuous of these metaphors simply cross
from one sense to another—they endlessly translate into unrelated
feelings and senses. With "bright voices," "sweet melodies," and
"velvet tones," for example, we easily compare sight, sound, taste,
and touch. . . .
Then, the rich ambiguity of metaphoric tension
finally strips "the veil of familiarity from the world"20
And, in that moment, "(you see) something noticeable which makes you
see something you weren’t noticing which makes you see something
that isn’t even visible."21
"The Lord came to me, saying . . . utter a
The Language of God
Calling prophetic metaphor—in its many forms—the
"language of God" is neither a figure of speech nor extravagant
exaggeration. In both sacred writing and sacred example, Scripture
confirms prophetic metaphor as the ultimate communion.
It is the only language, for example, that
surpasses its appearance—that transcends present reality—that
represents something "not there," something beyond itself, something
unseen. And, it is the only language that manifests its own
meaning—that reveals autonomous power—that even invokes "the
It is, after all, incarnational language:
The greatest metaphor of all time, for example,
was Jesus Himself. Prophetic metaphor confirmed His entire ministry.
And Paul said, "(Jesus) is the exact likeness of the unseen God [the
visible representation of the invisible]."24 Further, His
very death and resurrection, Paul said, were metaphors of our own
death and resurrection—in this life and the next life.25
Even today, great minds agree that metaphor has
something resembling "supernatural power":
Carl Hausman writes that metaphors are "active
forces in the world," that they have the power to bring "something
into being."26 Paul Ricoeur insists: They have "the power
not only to generate meaning but ultimately to change the world."27
And José Ortega y Gasset
confirms, "Metaphor is probably the most fertile power possessed by
In other words, metaphor doesn’t simply happen in
history, it is history. It doesn’t simply predict the future, it
fathers the future. Its fiction proves more powerful than fact.28
Why wouldn’t we already know this? We already
live metaphors. We already inhabit stories. In fact, creativity,
beauty, felt-meaning, transcendence, and a purposeful life are
impossible without metaphor. All the things that matter most—all the
things that make life mean what it means—require metaphor.
Is this mere subjectivity? Look, then, at our
Metaphor frequently proves itself more real than
today’s "reality." It dares to probe beyond the settled formula of
today’s "truth." It boldly ignores all the errors of today’s
"thinking." Indeed, great thinkers insist it is the only way we can
fully grasp the meaning of any word or idea.29 30
Johann-Georg Hamann wrote, "Divine truth appears
only through . . . contradictions of reason."31 And Søren
Kierkegaard echoed, "All existential truth is paradoxical . . .
(and) the language of revelation . . . (is) absolute paradox."32
So it follows that metaphor is the primal and
irreplaceable mode of all theology. It is the baptism of our
imagination—the empowerment of our spirit—the conversion of our
It is "the Word made flesh."33
Are we ready for this?
A new commonality of language, a new currency of
thought, a new lingua franca of the future is proving the new
voice of this age. We could call it a new "living language"—a new
"incarnation" of the Word—a new emergence of ancient metaphor. . . .
Or, we could call it a new technology of
talk—"technology" from the word tekhne, which means "art,"
and logia, which means "the study of." After all, a
larger-than-life art is emerging within this epic age of technology.
Granted, this new art often appears in hidden forms—it’s suddenly
not "art," it’s surprisingly not "fiction." Yet, the "arts"—hidden
or not—are becoming the coin of the realm.
Already at odds with the past, the language of
the future is an endowed "doing," while old language remains a
"labeling." New believers live evoked "events," while old believers
live doctrines. And, new image-makers find meaning in metaphor,
while old word-junkies look for renewal in rhetoric.
Yet, the past is past! History tolerates no
excuses! It’s not enough to say, "I don’t understand the language."
Or, "I’m not important enough to do anything prophetic." Or, "I’m
not talented in things artistic."
As they say, "Get over it!"
In both the ancient and future worlds, "The
greatest thing by far is to be a master of metaphor."34
The future of faith depends on it. Yes, the church has lost much,
but we’ll find our way back through a new language. Yes, our
credibility is diminished, but we’ll know the renaissance of hope
through a new metaphor. Whether we’re the CEO’s of our little
"kingdoms," mainstream secular artists, countercultural rebels, or
simply "pew-sitters," we must release the unique calling within.
Strangely enough, history needs more than more
Christians, it needs more Christians who respond to history. In a
world that refuses us, what could be more important than the
prophetic skills to reach that world?
That means wordy "prophets" must become
artists—masters of metaphor. And self-absorbed "artists" must become
prophets—masters of the "Word." That means the authority of
Scripture will require artists to render the
text. And the authority of art will require prophets to render the
Life, after all, is metaphor. "The fundamental
gestures of existence bear a symbolic potential."35
That’s the reason Paul said we must interpret "spiritual truths with
spiritual language."36 For Truth is "taught by the Spirit
with language appropriate to the Spirit."37
That "appropriateness" is prophetic metaphor,
and—in the hands of "unspoken" prophets—it will become the primary
tongue of our time—the most powerful force of our history.
The rediscovery of this truth brings incredible
revelations. If we understand the inspired language of metaphor, we
will understand the laws of all the arts—the awesome power of
worship—the interface of our time—and the very language of the Lord
© 2010 Thomas Hohstadt
1. Isaiah 43:19.
2. Revelations 21:1
3. Hosea 12:10 (The Hebrew God always moves in
history—He is the "Lord of History." And, in the original Hebrew,
Hosea tells us the same God speaks to us through damah or
prophetic metaphor—a far more revealing term than the usual
4. Eugene H. Peterson, The Message//Remix: The
Bible in Contemporary Language (Colorado Springs: NavPress,
2003) pp. 1199, 1200.
5. I Chronicles 25:1, 7; II Chronicles 29:30.
6. Ezekiel 32:33, AMP.
7. Hosea 12:10.
8. I Kings II:29-32, Jeremiah 13:1-9, 27:1-7;
Ezekiel 4:1-3, 5:1-4.
9. Hans Urs von Balthasar, quoted in Walter
Brueggemann, Finally Comes the Poet (Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 1989), p. 4 (my parentheses).
10. Isaiah 1:18, AMP.
11. Lakoff and Johnson, quoted in Fritjof Capra,
The HiddenConnections: Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and
Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability (New
York: Doubleday, 2002) p. 63.
12. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy
in the Flesh: TheEmbodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought
(New York, NY: Basic Books, 1999) pp 78, 95, 96,128.
13. Lakoff and Johnson, pp. 58, 59.
14. James Tobin, "To Fly!" Smithsonian,
April, 2003, p. 56.
15. Leanne Payne, Real Presence (Grand
Rapids: Baker Books, 2000) p. 80.
16. II Corinthians 3:3, AMP (my
17. Hebrew 11:1 (This Scripture is considered the
very definition of "faith").
18. Romans 4:17, KJ.
19. Leonard Sweet, informal comment.
20. The words of the poet, Shelley.
21. Norman Maclean, A River Runs Through It
(New York: Pocket Books, 1992) p. 101.
22. Ezekiel 24:1-3, AMP.
23. Murray Krieger, quoted in Carl Hausman,
Metaphor and Art: Interactionism and Reference in the Verbal and
Nonverbal Arts (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989) p.
24. Colossians 1:15, AMP.
25. Romans 6:5.
26. Carl Hausman, Metaphor and Art:
Interactionism and Reference in the Verbal and Nonverbal Arts
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989) pp. 5, 111, 198.
27. Morny Joy, "Images: Images and Imagination,"
The Encyclopedia of Religion, 1987 ed., VII, l08.
28. Walter Brueggemann, Finally Comes the Poet
(Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989), p. 6.
29. Brueggemann, p. 9.
30. C. S. Lewis,
31. Johann Georg Hamann, quoted in Louis Dupré,
Symbols of the Sacred (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000) p. 58.
32. Louis Dupré,
Symbols of the Sacred (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000) p. 58.
33. John 1:14.
34. Aristotle, in his Poetics, quoted in
pp. 122, 123.
36. Corinthians 2:13, AMP.
37. Corinthians 2:13, translated in Gordon D.
Fee, Paul, the Spirit, and the People of God (Peabody,
Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers, 1996) p. 80.